Title: Lullaby by Chuck Palahniuk
Topic: Book (Modern/Fiction/Dark Comedy)
Review Date: 9/05/2003
Link: Lullaby by Chuck Palahniuk
Anyway, If you've read that book or seen the movie, those should be reasonably good indications of what to be expecting style-wise. Its seems indicative of typical Palahniuk fashion: dystopia and black humor at its best.
Not terribly surprisingly, Lullaby's protagonist/narrator is a disaffected outsider with a jaded and cynical view of the world. This time out, however, there's a distinctively more occultish feel to the work (at least compared to my experience with the author, which is, admittedly, solely limited Fight Club). Without, hopefully, giving too much away, the plot revolves around the uncovering of a so-called "Culling Song*," by the protagonist (a journalist investigating apparently reasonless so-called "cradle deaths") in a book of Lullabies.
I've gotta say that I found this book a reasonably enjoyable read; Lullaby is definitely a quick and easy read (which can be a good or bad thing depending on your view). Palahniuk's style is fast, dark, and often quite funny- its also quite memorable and quoteable at times. The book (in my opinion) starts off strong, and dives you right into the action with the uncovery of the Culling Song.
Sadly, I personally found the later portions of the book a good deal less satisying. Though oftentimes interesting and always shocking in his views, the character "Oyster" is just no Tyler Durden in my book.
*HIGHLIGHT FOR BRIEF SPOILER* The discovery of the Book of Shadows was also less then spiff or satisfying, in my opinion as well.
I did, however, find the ending (which left things hanging) preferable to some tidy, but ultimately unfufilling, conclusion. Anyway, a reasonably fun and easy read if you like Palahniuk's style- and if you don't, you sure as hell shouldn't be reading his stuff ;-) As always with Palahniuk, I found him highly stylish and concise (...though clearly not a work Shakespeare). Substance-wise I found it a little uneven, however. Certainly ultra-cynical (and often blackly humorous ) philosophy permeates his work. Still, I found myself a little discontented plot wise. Certainly its a personal opinion sort of thing, but damnit, this is my review so deal with it! :-)
Think my review is off base/utter crap? E-mail here